![]() GitHub and Stack Overflow are used here first because of their size and second because of their public exposure of the data necessary for the analysis. There are many potential communities that could be surveyed for this analysis.They are nothing more or less than an examination of the correlation between two populations we believe to be predictive of future use, hence their value. No claims are made here that these rankings are representative of general usage more broadly.To be included in this analysis, a language must be observable within both GitHub and Stack Overflow.Given the recent variation, however, it will be interesting to observe whether or not this number continues to bounce.īefore we continue, please keep in mind the usual caveats. For this quarter’s ranking, the correlation between the properties was. For this run, however, the correlation between the properties is once again robust. 73 during our last run – the lowest recorded. Historically, the correlation between how a language ranks on GitHub versus its ranking on Stack Overflow has been strong, but this had been weakening in recent years. With the exception of GitHub’s decision to no longer provide language rankings on its Explore page – they are now calculated from the GitHub archive – the rankings are performed in the same manner, meaning that we can compare rankings from run to run, and year to year, with confidence. The idea is not to offer a statistically valid representation of current usage, but rather to correlate language discussion (Stack Overflow) and usage (GitHub) in an effort to extract insights into potential future adoption trends. The basic concept is simple: we periodically compare the performance of programming languages relative to one another on GitHub and Stack Overflow. We have changed the actual process very little since Drew Conway and John Myles White’s original work late in 2010. The data was dutifully collected at the start of the year, but we’re only now getting around to the the analysis portion. ![]() It’s been a very busy start to the year at RedMonk, so we’re a few weeks behind in the release of our bi-annual programming language rankings. Let us show you how to be a language genius, click here. With our purpose-built tools, we know a lot about polyglot. This iteration of the RedMonk Programming Language Rankings is brought to you by Rogue Wave Software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |